And, finally, it’s cooler – albeit only by three degrees. Its 63.46fps average at 1080p was just over three frames quicker than the GTX 970, and the Radeon then scored 44.2fps at 1440p – far better than the 36.7fps over the Nvidia card. scp.type = "text/javascript"; This is also the only game where the RX 480 led the way at every resolution and opened up a wider lead over the GTX 970 as I increased the pixel count. The system that I’m testing with has an Intel i7-8700K CPU overclocked to 5.0GHz in an MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon motherboard, along with 16GB of T-Force Night Hawk CL16 memory from Team Group … The new AMD Radeon RX 590 is an uprated version of the RX 580 on the smaller 12nm process node. Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to its use of the Unreal Engine 4. The 8GB card will have faster memory, too, with throughput of 8Gbps compared to 7Gbps from the lesser card. That’ll help when managing CPU and GPU workloads in games with DirectX 12, but it’s not a feature that’ll be coming to the GTX 970. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. The RX 590 has a 115 MHz higher core clock speed and 104 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 1050.This results in the RX 590 providing … ChannelID: '5f2bc16e3709e324807ce0c1', When compared to a modern GPU we’re looking at GTX 1060 3GB-like performance. Either way it’s not great news for the red team. Again, the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290, though despite that performance was still very playable. For this test we have 33 games tested at 1080p, a suitable resolution for these GPUs. Moving on we find a close battle when testing with Resident Evil 2, here the R9 290 was just 6fps faster at 1080p and this meant the 970 performed more like a 3GB 1060, not a bad result given the average frame rate was 66 fps, but this one is still a win for the Radeon 290. Is it worth shelling out for the new Radeon, or can Nvidia’s classic GTX 970 hold its own? Based on 1,226,223 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 580 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. (v.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || v.documentElement.appendChild(v.createElement('head'))).appendChild(scp); The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. PlacementID: 'plte5ygLBZuT8RrDXzB', BG_Color: '', AMD is building the RX 480 in two versions – one with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, and one with 8GB. The 970 was still the superior GPU in this title. Its stock and boost clocks sit at 1,050MHz and 1,250MHz, and it has just one memory configuration: 4GB of GDDR5.Related: Best gaming PC specs to build yourself. Mike has worked as a technology journalist for more than a decade, writing for most of the UK’s most well-known websites and magazines. This one’s too close to call and well within the margin of error. Despite its 3.5GB of fast VRAM, the GTX 970 remains the more reliable performer which might surprise some of you, especially after you’ve no doubt heard over and over again how it’s doomed and will be completely useless before too long. World of Tanks is a game that doesn’t like AMD GPUs that much, or AMD GPUs don’t like World of Tanks. AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s Now if you’ve been holding out all these years for a $300-$400 upgrade, the GeForce RTX 2060 might be of interest. DiRT 4 also favors Radeon GPUs using CMAA, while Strange Brigade is an AMD sponsored title and well optimized for Radeon GPUs. Those 34fps averages will be undermined by sluggish minimum framerates, especially when the on-screen action becomes more frantic. There’s a lot to like about the fourth iteration of the Graphics Core Next system, not least the move from a 28nm to a 14nm manufacturing process. Frame rates were surprisingly similar when testing with Battlefield V, here the GTX 970 was just 3 fps faster which comes to be a 5% margin. This means that the narrow lead the GTX 970 shows in any of the above benchmarks will likely be diminished by more powerful RX 480s. var scp = v.createElement("script"), This is a GPU designed for Full HD and 1440p gaming, and in those department it’s stop on – but any higher resolutions will cause it to struggle. scp.onload = function() { The RX 480 consistently beats its rival while consuming less power: its peak draw of 249W is eleven fewer than the same machine with the GTX 970 installed. The Radeon’s top temperature of 70°C is an excellent result, and it means there’s no need to fret about overheating.Performance Conclusions. Next up we have Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than I was expecting. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 sits in the middle of Nvidia’s latest range, but it’s not got new hardware inside – its Maxwell architecture first debuted in 2013’s mainstream GTX 750 Ti card. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon RX 580. In this comparison, the RX 480 takes a clear win in the 1440p stakes. That supports my conclusions from real-world tests: the GTX 970 might be better in lower resolutions and easier games, but the RX 480 is a more efficient architecture and deploys its power with more aplomb – therefore it takes key victories in tougher tests. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) remove from comparison. Benchmarks with Battlefield V, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, GTA 5, Witcher 3, Metal Gear Solid 5 and other popular games Throughout 2015 the GTX 970 was typically the puncher GPU and with a slew of quality AIB models to pick from, it easily outsold the R9 290. It’s a victory for the RX 480 in most of the important tests, then, but don’t go thinking that AMD’s cut-price card will handle 4K gaming smoothly. The Radeon’s specification compares well to Nvidia’s older card. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). That’s clear evidence of the newer architecture, increased memory throughput and shrunken manufacturing process paying dividends. The RX 480’s new architecture and lower price see it charge headlong into one of computing’s busiest battlefields – and, in particular, up against Nvidia’s older GTX 970. Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing with Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. With the larger number of pixels deployed the RX 480 averaged 57.2fps, which was more than a frame faster than the Nvidia card. The GTX 970 also stacks up really well in Metro Exodus with an average of 48 fps at 1080p using the ultra quality settings. For the testing, I’m using the MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 970 4GB and Gigabyte Radeon RX 580 8GB Gaming graphics cards. GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon RX 580. options here in mid-2019. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 v AMD Radeon RX 480 – Performance I’ve tested these powerful cards with five games. With those comparisons previously established it comes as no surprise that the R9 290 dusts the GTX 970 beating it by a 19% margin. We promise the order of the games wasn’t chosen on purpose but here we have yet another title that works extremely well with AMD GPUs. AdUnitType: '2', The Radeon averaged 27.33fps at 4K. This meant it was 23% faster than the R9 290, placing it basically on par with 6GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. This is one area where the Maxwell GPUs had a big advantage over the AMD competition and it’s an advantage Nvidia still holds today. Warum ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 besser als AMD Radeon RX 590? It features the following components: I’ve tested these powerful cards with five games. There you have it, the GTX 970 went from ~10-15% faster four years ago to a percent faster in 2019 against the Radeon R9 290 based on our 33 game test sample that includes many newer titles. scp.async = true; window.addEventListener( 'load', function() { There’s very little to choose between these two cards in the synthetic 3D Mark Fire Strike test. That means the game isn’t playable at its maximum settings at 3,840 x 2,160, but it was a whopping 37.61% faster than the GTX 970 in the same test. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). The GeForce GTX 590 was an enthusiast-class graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in March 2011. The GTX 970 is similarly quick at those resolutions and is a tad cheaper, but it doesn’t have the new architecture, the extra memory or the software improvements – as you’d expect for an older card, of course. }; The doomsday scenario still hasn’t happened and with a few minor tweaks the GTX 970 can carve its way through the latest and greatest titles at 1080p without an issue. Let's see those blue bar graphs now... First up we have Apex Legends and right away we’re seeing pretty neck and neck performance between the GTX 970 and R9 290. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 42.9 GPixel/s The GTX 970 uses the older 28nm manufacturing process, which means it has half a billion fewer transistors than its rival, and it only has 1,664 stream processors. The test rig drew 249W from the mains with the Radeon installed, which is 11W less than the Nvidia-powered machine required. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. Based on what we’ve seen so far we don’t imagine the GTX 970 is still 10-15% faster like what most reviewers found back in late 2014. Hitman Max Settings at 1,920 x 1,080, average
GTX 970: 59
RX 480: 69.7Max Settings at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 45.4
RX 480: 54.3Max Settings at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 25.08
RX 480: 30.6. Still the GeForce 970 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in 16 of the 33 games tested, while the R9 290 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in just 11 of the games. That’s a gap of 5.77% improving to a gap of 20.44%. We haven’t tested the GTX 1060 in 3GB form, but we have full benchmarks of the 6GB version, which show it’s a worthy 1440p card. The card based on the GM204 Maxwell chip, that is already available in the desktop GeForce GTX 970 … There’s your ‘fine wine’ working right there, a.k.a. 24.4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? Its average of 30.6fps is five frames better than the GTX 970 and it does break the important 30fps barrier, but don’t assume that it’ll play Hitman smoothly at 4K without compromising on several of the graphics options. XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1405MHz OC+, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Double Dissipation, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, PCI-E AMD Graphics Card (RX … Nvidia grabbed recent headlines with its flagship GPU launches, but AMD stole some of that thunder with the new Radeon RX 480. Intro The GeForce GTX 970 has clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It’s no surprise that both cards blitzed this rally racer at 1080p: the RX 480 averaged 88.9fps, while the Nvidia card was about nine frames faster. Prices fluctuate pretty rapidly, which is why the GTX 970 is such a close competitor to the RX 480. Architecture We may earn a commission if you click a deal and buy an item. There’s a clear trend to be seen across most of my test games: if a game is a tougher benchmark, the RX 480 tends to outperform its older rival. Hitman is a game designed with AMD in mind, so the results here aren’t surprising. For those wondering back when we reviewed the GTX 1060 6GB at launch, the 970 was 15% slower, so no ‘Nvidia gimping’ as it’s often referred to appears to have taken place. (function (v,i) { The AMD Radeon RX 560 for laptops (RX 560M) is a mid-range Polaris 11 / 21 gaming graphics card for … With the release of the GeForce GTX 1660, Nvidia is resetting its midrange GPU line and putting AMD's Radeon RX 590 square in the crosshairs. It has a reasonable 2,304 stream processors divided into 36 Compute Units for more granular task delegation, and its core sits at stock and boost speeds of 1,120MHz and 1,266MHz. It was mostly the older titles, or Nvidia sponsored games where the green team did well, games such as World of Tanks, Warhammer II, Metro Exodus, Project Cars 2, and Fortnite, for example. Moving on we decided to see how the GTX 970 stacks up against the GTX 1060 6GB. ¿Por qué es Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 mejor que AMD Radeon RX 590? It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … During his time writing about technology he’s developed obsessio…, AMD Radeon RX 480 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970. There’s little between their power consumption ratings, despite that: the RX 480’s 150W power demand is only five Watts higher than the GTX 970. That’s good, but don’t expect either of these GPUs to handle 4K gaming. Each title is run at its highest settings, and I’ve tested each game at 1,920 x 1,080, 2,560 x 1,440 and 3,840 x 2,160 – 4K.I’ve also used a selection of synthetic benchmarks, with 3D Mark’s demanding Fire Strike test alongside benchmarks to measure power consumption and peak temperature. The GTX 970 leads the way with a score of 2,767 points, but the RX 480 is barely behind thanks to its result of 2,638 points. They are guilty of prioritizing newer architectures while optimizations for older generations tend to come later, if at all for the really old models. At least today we can settle which GPU offers the best performance in 2019. DivID: '', Radeon RX 580 GeForce GTX 970; GPU Name: Ellesmere (Ellesmere XT) vs: GM204 (GM204-200-A1) Fab Process: 14 nm: vs: 28 nm: Die Size: 232 mm²: vs: 398 mm²: Transistors Índice de píxeles 17.76 GPixel/s mayor? Nvidia’s card continued its 1080p lead with an average framerate of 85.4fps, but its advantage was a slim 2fps – and it was overturned when I turned the resolution up to 2,560 x 1,440. It features 1664 SPUs as well as 104 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. Each title is run at its highest settings, and I’ve … Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 580, which makes use of a 14 nm design. That’s a bigger leap than Nvidia has taken with its new 16nm Pascal cards, and it means that AMD can cram even more transistors into the same area without increasing heat and power consumption. In other words, this is one of the best GTX 970s around versus an early RX 480 that’ll surely improve over time with third-party manufacturers pre-overclocking it and adding beefy cooling systems. Both of these GPUs managed to run the benchmark at 4K, too. AMD also does well in The Division 2, Sniper Elite 4, Forza Horizon 4, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) Radeon RX 5700 vs GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Comparison #AMD #ModernWarfare #Nvidia TechEpiphany Tech Epiphany. If you want to read our individual reviews, you can click here for the RX 480 and the GTX 970. The Radeon’s average of 54.3fps will ensure smooth gameplay at this higher resolution. So the GeForce GTX 970 was the more consistent performer, the smaller 3.5GB primary VRAM partition will have hurt it in Wolfenstein, especially with the settings used for testing. AMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. It’s safe to say performance is identical using either GPU. }, 2000 ); So here we’re comparing a 2014 release with an MSRP of $330 to a 2016 release with a $250 MSRP. The 970 does perform significantly better than the 3GB 1060, but even so you’ll want to dial the quality settings down a little. Text_Color: '', Guidance requested regarding upgraded configuration of computer, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. It’s a competitive set of results for a title that’s among the toughest benchmarks around thanks to its reliance on high-end lighting and particle effects. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers. That said the 1% low performance was more consistent, though the experience was still extremely smooth with the 970. That means the GTX 970 had an 8.63% lead, but the gap closed to 5.81% at 1440p – perhaps because the RX 480 is flexing its extra transistors and memory. Performance at 1080p using the ultra quality preset certainly was respectable and you won’t need to turn down any quality settings here. Rise of the Tomb RaiderMax Settings at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 60
RX 480: 63.5Max Settings at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 36.7
RX 480: 44.2Max Settings at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 19.9RX 480: 27.3Tomb Raider strains graphics cards with trickier weather and lighting effects than most other titles on the market. That said let’s see what the 33 game comparison has for us. Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB GDDR5 (256 Bit) DVI-D, 2xHDMI, 2xDP (11265-31-20G) Lite-On iHAS124-14 SilentiumPC Armis AR3 TG (SPC199) HyperX DDR4, 16GB, 3200MHz, CL16 (HX432C16PB3K2/16) MSI B450 TOMAHAWK AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz, 16MB, BOX (YD2600BBAFBOX) XFX TS Single Rail 650W (P1-650G-TS3X) Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA3 … Synthetic Benchmarks, Power and Heat3D Mark Fire Strike Ultra
GTX 970: 2767
RX 480: 2638Peak power:
GTX 970: 260W
RX 480: 249WPeak temperature:
GTX 970: 73
RX 480: 70. The Division 2 is a title that works exceptionally well with AMD hardware. So today we’ve got an old fashioned GPU battle pitting the GeForce GTX 970 against the Radeon R9 290.