furmark score 1070
The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) Discussion. I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) 1080p 34°C Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I get a failure when I try to Submit results. Testing furmark … ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz Scores on this page must be bad…. Might help. Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. If any of that might affect results, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098 i should be 2nd on list 3600points for radeon 7950, @Andrew try setting your graphics 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 Update drivers etc too. Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). MSAA samples: 0 is that right? CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor What are your thoughts? 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) ??? GPU mem: 1300MHz cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 BTW, am using v1.10.0. 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Sounds quite low to me . lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. Hope this helps in some way. Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% crap monitor x.x) clocks not available 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. Temp at 100% 66c NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] resolution:1920×1080 – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. Window mode: fullscreen drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Max GPU Temp: 0°C Duration: 5min Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 GPU clock: 1005 MHz My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. CPU speed: 3403 MHz I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB Update: 2016.08.25 Jerome, somethings wrong here. using msi afterburner. MSAA samples: 0 This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. Average 38fps. I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. System memory: 4094 MB The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz , 3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good. Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB Bench duration: 15min Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 740 Processor Results: MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz Here's the excel doc. GPU clock: 1050 MHz The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 Preset:1080 13FPS and 836 score. – Radeon RX 5500 XT Is that bad if so what could be causing this? The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. FurMark 1.22.0.0 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080, GTX 680 (stock cooling) @ The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. MSAA samples: 0 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Graphics score looks fine. , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 found on the 3GB GTX 1060. In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Tested more than twice. Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798) Why is there no 6850 listed? FX 8120 @ 4ghz Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% Memory clock: 1500 MHz To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset. Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. No AA this time Who’s laughing now. Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz Max GPU Temp: 80°C Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). How come 5+3/2=2 eh? 4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1) Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. Peak temp: 94°C Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. 1080p, 7970 x1 Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz FYI 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz D: @Sammus: what about the Powertune settings? GPU mem: 1800MHz Overclock it? GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 hate it when i do that lol. GeForce GTX 465 If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. CPU Speed 2395 MHz Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. CPU: 3013 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. Who’s laughing now. GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz CPU Speed: 3510MHz I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. Temperature was 78°. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz But you should see a good difference Too hot? CPU speed: 3499 MHz FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. so whats’ wrong? Its pretty strange. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz MSAA samples: 0 Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) How about TimeSpy? Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C 7850 Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. – GeForce GTX TITAN system memory:8172 MB GPU clock: 1019 MHz ... 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score. GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz 4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz. I only ask because that is the only fix I know. Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Максимальная температура 66 ° C I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Resolution: 1920 x 1080 max fps in full HD: ~43 Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. RAM: 16383 MB i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. I let the test run for an hour. FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. ASUS P8Z77-VLK FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … This seems surprisingly low to me. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz – GeForce GTX TITAN Black 2046 MB Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz @ 2xAA 13190 frames, 14 FPS FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 Resolution: 1280 x 720 AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Memory clock: 3004 MHz I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:35 points (0 FPS, 60000 ms) GPU core: 1380MHz Average 36fps. I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. I suggest you do the same if you want a direct comparison. GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz second was using prof 5. just ran a 3rd with profile 5 to write the results down. With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. Update: 2017.12.12 Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg – added Preset:2160 scores. System Info: 3125 MHz Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545. We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Or Firestrike? Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 1830 MHz/1535 MB Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. Windows 7 64-bit build 760 Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C 59Deg C. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak. – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. System Memory: 16330 MB Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. Windows XP 32 Bit Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Preset:1080 Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. Graphics drivers: The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz 63Deg C. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562, 3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms) This means that the […] http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) Isnt that a little low for my rig? thanks in advance! AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} – Radeon RX Vega 64 CrossFire I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). I got an intel core i5 4460 3,2GHz, asrock h97 anniversary mobo, 240gb samsung evo 850 ssd (Win10 inside), gtx 1070 palit 8GB, hyperx ddr3 8 gb RAM, 1TB HDD. Core Clock—- 950(MHz) But this is my first pascal card. Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) System Memory |2046MB 2 different tests on 15 min burn. Is it about what I should be expecting though? 700W FSP Aurum PSU 4gb DDR3 ram. Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. So what’s the formula here my man. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) The max. It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? Preset:1080 Min temp 60°C CPU: 4616 MHz @ 1920×1080 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz Dynamic background – Radeon RX Vega 64. CPU speed:4709 MHz These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb @ 1920×1080 – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. Catalyst: 13.5 3900 MHz/16337 MB should mention OS win8 64 bit temperature 57°C. Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 Catalyst 13.1 GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS), Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Preset:1080 FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. Memory clock: 1500 MHz http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 PC Specification: Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg But can in 720. From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. Or passmark’s performance test 9? Burn-in The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. bench duration:15min well check the 4th line: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 – Radeon RX 470, Update: 2014.11.10 It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator.